Role of Strain Elastography in the Evaluation of Borderline Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer Patients

Authors

  • Bahjat Abdulrahman Muhammad Radiology center at Sulaymaniyah Surgical Teaching Hospital
  • Kawa Abdullah Mahmood College of Medicine University of Sulaymaniyah

Keywords:

Borderline or unspecified axillary lymph node, Elastography, Strain elastography, Strain ratio, Elasticity score

Abstract

Background: Detection of malignant infiltration in axillary lymph node remains a significant
predictive factor in breast cancer with a significant impact on prognosis and staging. Elastography
new ultrasound method developed that measures the stiffness of tissue can diagnose early
malignant change in the cortex of lymph node and can help to decrease the use of invasive
procedures.
Aim of the study: Analyzing strain elastography findings in borderline axillary lymph nodes
in breast cancer patients.
Patients and method: This is a prospective cohort study conducted in the Breast Center/Shar
Hospital / Sulaymaniyah City/ Iraq, in a period of one year between October 2022 and October
2023. Forty-two patients 2 males and 40 females with newly diagnosed breast cancer were
included in the study, we examined the patients with conventional ultrasound and elastography
with a 7.5-12MHz superficial linear transducer using Samsung HS60 and Samsung V7 ultrasound
machines. After determining whether borderline axillary LNs were present ultrasound
elastography was performed for the borderline lymph node, and each case was properly described
and reported. After gray-scale ultrasonography, Elastography (real-time Elastography) was
conducted. In our study, we used a 5-point scoring system. To determine the strain ratio, a circular
region of interest (ROI) was positioned in the axillary fat, and the second ROI was set at the same
level and of the same size over the stiffest part of the lymph node being studied. The final reference
was the histopathological result of the core needle biopsy of the examined lymph node.
Results: A total of 42 patients were studied, the age range was between 33- 77 years old. 54.8%
(n=23) of our patients were negative for malignant cells, whereas 45.2% (n=19) were positive. The
strain ratio (SR) of the negative results for malignant cells (1.8 ± 0.9) was much lower than the
positive results (4.7 ± 1.4). Two-thirds (65.2%, n=15) of the negative results had SR less than 2.1
and the rest 34.8% (n=8) were ≥ 2.1. On the contrary, the positive results, (94.7%, n=18) were ≥
2.1, and only 5.3% (n=1) was below 2.1, with a statistically highly significant difference
(P<0.001). Regarding elasticity score, more than half (56.5%, n=13) of the patients with negative
results for malignant cells have score 2, about one-third (34.8%, n=8) have score 3, and 4.3% (n=1)
have score 4, also, score 1 was 4.3% (n=1). Paradoxically, the majority of the positives (52.6%,
n=10) have score 3, followed by score 4 (21.1%, n=4) then score 2 (15.8%, n=3) then score 5
(10.5%, n=2). With a significant difference (P=0.027).
Conclusion: The strain ratio and elasticity score of malignant borderline axillary lymph node is
much higher than that of benign lymph node, making this new ultrasound method superior to B
mode in the detection of early malignant infiltration to the cortex of axillary lymph node. These
two non-invasive methods (B-mode ultrasound and elastography) can be used together to increase
diagnostic accuracy. 65.2%, (n=15) of the negative results had SR less than 2.1 whereas 94.7%
(n=18) of malignant cases had a strain ratio ≥ 2.1. Regarding elasticity score 60% of benign cases
had scores 2 and 1, whereas 84% of malignant cases had scores 3,4, and 5.

References

(01) Abe H, Schmidt RA, Kulkarni K, Sennett CA, Mueller JS, Newstead GM. Axillary lymph nodes

suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy--clinical

experience in 100 patients. Radiology. 2009;250(1):41-49. doi:10.1148/radiol.2493071483.

(02) Almerey T, Villacreses D, Li Z, et al. Value of axillary ultrasound after negative axillary MRI for

evaluating nodal status in high-risk breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;228(5):792-797.

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.01.022.

(03) Alvarez S, Añorbe E, Alcorta P, López F, Alonso I, Cortés J. Role of sonography in the diagnosis of

axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a systematic review. AJR Am J Roentgenol.

;186(5):1342-1348. doi:10.2214/AJR.05.0936.

(04) Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical

use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34(3):238-253.

doi:10.1055/s-0033-1335375.

(05) Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Fink M, Tanter M. Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques.

Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(5):487-495. doi:10.1016/j.diii.2013.01.022.

(06) Liao S, von der Weid PY. Lymphatic system: an active pathway for immune protection. Semin Cell

Dev Biol. 2015;38:83-89. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.11.012.

(07) Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical

use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol.

;41(5):1126-1147. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.00.

(08) Gierke HEV, Oestreicher HL, Franke EK, Parrack HO, Wittern WWV. Physics of vibrations in living

tissues. J Appl Physiol. 1952;4(12):886-900. doi:10.1152/jappl.1952.4.12.886.

(09) Sarvazyan A, Hall TJ, Urban MW, Fatemi M, Aglyamov SR, Garra BS. An overview of Elastography - an emerging branch of medical imaging. Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2011;7(4):255-282.

doi:10.2174/157340511798038684.

(10) Wilson LS, Robinson DE. Ultrasonic measurement of small displacements and deformations of tissue.

Ultrason Imaging. 1982;4(1):71-82. doi:10.1177/016173468200400105.

elasticity

of

(11) Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging

the

biological

doi:10.1177/016173469101300201.

tissues.

Ultrason

Imaging.

;13(2):111-134.

(12) Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical

use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34(2):169

doi:10.1055/s-0033-1335205.

(13) Ting CE, Yeong CH, Ng KH, Abdullah BJJ, Ting HE. Accuracy of tissue elasticity measurement using

shear wave ultrasound elastography: A comparative phantom study. In: IFMBE Proceedings. Cham:

Springer International Publishing; 2015:252-255.

(14) Morikawa H, Fukuda K, Kobayashi S, et al. Real-time tissue elastography as a tool for the noninvasive

assessment of liver stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46(3):350-358.

doi:10.1007/s00535-010-0301-x.

(15) Johnson L, Huppe A, Wagner JL, Amin AL, Balanoff CR, Larson KE. Is image-guided core needle

biopsy of borderline axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients clinically helpful? Am J Surg.

;223(1):101-105. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.07.021.

(16) Zaleska-Dorobisz U, Kaczorowski K, Pawluś A, Puchalska A, Inglot M. Ultrasound elastography -

review of techniques and its clinical applications. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2014;23(4):645-655.

doi:10.17219/acem/26301.

(17) Mazur R, Celmer M, Silicki J, Hołownia D, Pozowski P, Międzybrodzki K. Clinical applications of

spleen ultrasound elastography - a review. J Ultrason. 2018;18(72):37-41. doi:10.15557/JoU.2018.0006.

(18) Muhi AM, Kamal AM, Dawood SN, Kareem TF, Thameen Fakhri RT, Al-Attar Z. The role of strain

elastography in evaluating borderline axillary lymph nodes. Al-Kindy Col Med J. 2022;18(1):68-72.

doi:10.47723/kcmj.v18i1.692.

(19) AHMED M. MONIB, M.D.; MARIAM K.F. MIKHAIL, M.Sc, Mansour MDM. The Role of

Ultrasound Elastography in Evaluation for Axillary Lymph Nodes of Patients with Breast Cancer. The

Medical Journal of Cairo University. 2021;89(6):519-527. doi:10.21608/mjcu.2021.167840.

(20) Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi J, Fukuda H, Tachikake T, Ito K. Accuracy of sonographic elastography

in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: Comparison with conventional B-mode

sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):604-610. doi:10.2214/ajr.07.3401.

(21) Choi JJ, Kang BJ, Kim SH, et al. Role of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of

papillary lesions in breast. Jpn J Radiol. 2012;30(5):422-429. doi:10.1007/s11604-012-0070-y.

(22 Barr RG, Ferraioli G, Palmeri ML, et al. Elastography assessment of liver fibrosis: Society of

Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement. Radiology. 2015;276(3):845-861.

doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150619.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-30

Issue

Section

ARTICLE