Characterization of Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) Hydrogels for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32792/jmed.2025.29.21Keywords:
GelMA, Hydrogel, Characterization, Cartilage tissue applicationsAbstract
Articular cartilage, a tissue that is particularly known for its self-repairingdeficiency, is a major challenge in regenerative medicine. Gelatin Methacrylate
(GelMA) is a multifunctional and biocompatible hydrogel, which has attracted
much attention as a potential scaffold material for cartilage tissue engineering.
This paper gives a detailed characterization of GelMA hydrogels with regard to
the effect of polymer concentration on their physicochemical and biological
properties. We performed an in-depth analysis of GelMA at concentrations of 5%,
10% and 15% (w/v) and their mechanical strength, swelling kinetics, degradation
rates and porous architecture. Additionally, we have synthesized and critically
reviewed optimal parameters for 3D bio-printing of constructs based on GelMA
for cartilage regeneration. Our results show that the mechanical properties are
significantly improved with an increase in the concentration of GelMA from 5%
to 15%, and the compressive modulus has been increased from 3.3 +- 0.5 kPa to
30.0 +- 4.0 kPa. This enhancement, however, comes with a decrease in porosity,
swelling ratio and degradation rate. While no one GelMA formulation reproduced
the mechanical properties of native articular cartilage, a 10% (w/v) concentration
of GelMA, with optimized 3D bioprinting parameters, appears to be a well
balanced formulation. It provides a good compromise between mechanical
stability and microenvironment that allows the viability, proliferation, and
chondrogenesis of cells. This critical review highlights the opportunities of the
GelMA as a highly tunable and promising platform in which effective and
clinically relevant cartilage repair and regeneration strategies can be developed.
References
Sophia Fox AJ, Bedi A, Rodeo S a. The Basic Science of Articular Cartilage: Structure, Composition, and Function.
Sport
A Multidiscip Approach [Internet]. 2009 Nov 1;1(6):461–8. Available from:
http://sph.sagepub.com/lookup/doi/10.1177/1941738109350438
Danila MI. Biology of normal joint and evaluation of the joint including clinical, imaging, and pathologic evaluation.
;
Wilson DABT-CVA, editor. Ultrasound: Musculoskeletal. In Saint Louis: W.B. Saunders; 2012. p. 830–5. Available
from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781416099796008229
Krakowski P, Rejniak A, Sobczyk J, Karpiński R. Cartilage integrity: A review of mechanical and frictional properties
and repair approaches in osteoarthritis. In: Healthcare. MDPI; 2024. p. 1648.
Leifer VP, Katz JN, Losina E. The burden of OA-health services and economics. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2022;30(1):10–6.
Camp CL, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Current concepts of articular cartilage restoration techniques in the knee. Sports
Health. 2014;6(3):265–73.
Armiento AR, Alini M, Stoddart MJ. Articular fibrocartilage-Why does hyaline cartilage fail to repair? Adv Drug
Deliv Rev. 2019;146:289–305.
Rana D, Kumar TSS, Ramalingam M. Cell-Laden Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering. J Biomater Tissue Eng [Internet].
;4(7):507–35.
Available
from:
&volume=4&issue=7&spage=507
http://openurl.ingenta.com/content/xref?genre=article&issn=2157
Jahani A, Nourbakhsh MS, Ebrahimzadeh MH, Mohammadi M, Yari D, Moradi A. Biomolecules-loading of 3D
printed alginate-based scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering applications: a review on current status and future
prospective. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(2):92.
Hago EE, Xinsong L, Kai JJ, Levett PA, Melchels FPW, Schrobback K, et al. A New Route Toward IPN
Photocrosslinked Alginate Hydrogels with Biodegradation Rates, Excellent Biocompatibility and Mechanical
Properties.
J Biomater Tissue Eng [Internet]. 2014;4(2):89–98. Available
http://openurl.ingenta.com/content/xref?genre=article&issn=2157-9083&volume=4&issue=2&spage=89
from: Puppi D, Chiellini F, Piras a. MM, Chiellini E. Polymeric materials for bone and cartilage repair. Prog Polym Sci
[Internet]. 2010;35(4):403–40. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TX2-4Y8G5SJ
/2/a189a4998515b1c2b49e2c5039b2364c
Savsani K, Aitchison AH, Allen NB, Adams EA, Adams SB. The Use of Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) in Cartilage
Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review. Bioengineering. 2025;12(7):700.
Shin H, Olsen BD, Khademhosseini A. The mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of cell-laden double-network
hydrogels based on photocrosslinkable gelatin and gellan gum biomacromolecules. Biomaterials. 2012;33(11):3143
Occhetta P, Visone R, Russo L, Cipolla L, Moretti M, Rasponi M. VA-086 methacrylate gelatine photopolymerizable
hydrogels: A parametric study for highly biocompatible 3D cell embedding. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A [Internet].
Jun;103(6):2109–17. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25294368
Mishbak H, Caetano GF, Pereira RF, Bartolo PJ. Photocurable Crosslinked Sodium Alginate and Gelatin based
hydrogels for articular cartilage applications. 2016;6.
Bupphathong S, Quiroz C, Huang W, Chung P-F, Tao H-Y, Lin C-H. Gelatin methacrylate hydrogel for tissue
engineering applications—a review on material modifications. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15(2):171.
Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, Tamayol A, Annabi N, Khademhosseini A. Synthesis, properties, and
biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2015;73:254–71.
Kim Y-H, Dawson JI, Oreffo ROC, Tabata Y, Kumar D, Aparicio C, et al. Gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for
musculoskeletal tissue regeneration. Bioengineering. 2022;9(7):332.
Hong S-J, Kim D-H, Ryoo J-H, Park S-M, Kwon H-C, Keum D-H, et al. Influence of gelatin on adhesion, proliferation,
and adipogenic differentiation of adipose tissue-derived stem cells cultured on soy protein–agarose scaffolds. Foods.
;13(14):2247.
Asim S, Tabish TA, Liaqat U, Ozbolat IT, Rizwan M. Advances in gelatin bioinks to optimize bioprinted cell
functions. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023;12(17):2203148.
Guo A, Zhang S, Yang R, Sui C. Enhancing the mechanical strength of 3D printed GelMA for soft tissue engineering
applications. Mater Today Bio. 2024;24:100939.
Zhu M, Wang Y, Ferracci G, Zheng J, Cho N-J, Lee BH. Gelatin methacryloyl and its hydrogels with an exceptional
degree of controllability and batch-to-batch consistency. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6863.
Lee BH, Lum N, Seow LY, Lim PQ, Tan LP. Synthesis and characterization of types A and B gelatin methacryloyl
for bioink applications. Materials (Basel). 2016;9(10):797.
Iyer KS, Bao L, Zhai J, Jayachandran A, Luwor R, Li JJ, et al. Microgel-based bioink for extrusion-based 3D
bioprinting and its applications in tissue engineering. Bioact Mater. 2025;48:273–93.
Yin J, Yan M, Wang Y, Fu J, Suo H. 3D bioprinting of low-concentration cell-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)
bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(8):6849–57.
Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H, Hwang CM, Yamanlar S, Khademhosseini A. Cell-laden microengineered gelatin
methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2010;31(21):5536–44.
Schuurman W, Levett PA, Pot MW, van Weeren PR, Dhert WJA, Hutmacher DW, et al. Gelatin‐methacrylamide
hydrogels as potential biomaterials for fabrication of tissue‐engineered cartilage constructs. Macromol Biosci.
;13(5):551–61.
Mow VC, Kuei SC, Lai WM, Armstrong CG. Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression:
theory and experiments. J Biomech Eng. 1980;102(1):73–84.
Beck EC, Barragan M, Tadros MH, Gehrke SH, Detamore MS. Approaching the compressive modulus of articular
cartilage with a decellularized cartilage-based hydrogel. Acta Biomater [Internet]. 2015; Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.019
Annabi N, Tamayol A, Uquillas JA, Akbari M, Bertassoni LE, Cha C, et al. 25th anniversary article: Rational design
and applications of hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv Mater [Internet]. 2014 Jan;26(1):85–124. Available from:
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/adma.201303233
Ostrovidov S, Salehi S, Costantini M, Suthiwanich K, Ebrahimi M, Sadeghian RB, et al. 3D bioprinting in skeletal
muscle tissue engineering. Small. 2019;15(24):1805530.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hussein Mishbak, Mohammed A. Albadri, Mohammedsadiq A. Hasan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
